Home

 

Welcome and thanks for dropping by.

This site discusses arguments for a conceptual hypothesis – that of Quantum Temporal Dynamics. My effort is aimed at the hugely ambitious goal of having the QTD principles described here integrated into the Standard Model of Physics as a 'missing piece of the puzzle', uniting Relativity and Quantum theory. This work has been published and under continual review and revision since 1996, inspired to a great degree by 'The Whispering Pond' by Ervin Laszlo and QED by Richard Feynman.

Many of the concepts included herein have at least been alluded to by the 'great grand-daddies' of all things quantum; Niels Bohr in his 1922 Nobel interviews and speech where he alluded to the possibility of time (temporal) quanta AND Albert Einstein's 1916 paper, 'Geometric Theory of Gravitation' in which he described a flexible, compressible and stretchable 'fabric' of space-time. Naturally, there are a multitude of other inspirational thoughts articulated by inspired intellects which have also contributed to my thoughts described on this site and in many papers previously.

One major word of thanks goes to those many folks who have contributed by illustrating where previous thoughts simply did not hold under identified experimental outcomes.  The first principle of science is that a theory which is valid must ALWAYS produce accurate predictions and ALSO be demonstrated to NOT produce inaccurate predictions. I have had many 'good sounding' ideas which simply have not held up, and using the medium of the internet, have had constructive and sometimes, accurate but derisional contributions (I prefer constructive please!) which have ultimately aided greatly the development of this conceptual hypothesis. Science must first be dispassionate and be driven only by that which can be proven – all else are ideas to be believed in (wished upon, hoped for etc.).

Is this work complete?  No way!!  This work is one still in progress and development, and will remain as such until validated by experimental proof and scientific rigor; until then, it remains a conceptual hypothesis only. For the record, I seek collaboration with a mathematician or team with sufficient skill to take these principles from conceptual hypothesis to scientific hypothesis and develop the proofs required to enter into the crucible of scientific rigor. 

Whilst the mathematics used in physics is daunting for those unschooled in its beauty and elegance (whilst I have a reasonable idea, I still include myself in this category for honest representation), the formulae that make up the Standard Model are truly the most simple and accurate ways of describing our physical universe and the interactions of the various factors therein. In the parallel concepts section, there will be a fast explanation of why such descriptions are necessary and a very basic overview of how algebra works so the reader can understand the beauty and inevitability of such mathematical expressions.

Before even launching into the details of QTD, a little ground work must be done.  If you are familiar with the subject matter offered in the background section, please feel free to 'fast-forward' to the Parallel Concepts area of the QTD area.  For all others, especially those with little background in physics, please take the time to read through the very abridged and simplified background pages which will, hopefully, give you a broad understanding of the background against which this hypothesis is proposed.

I invite all who have something constructive to say to please drop me a line, whether pointing out a problem in my hypothesis, or wishing to contribute to its furtherance! I feel that the [pre-internet] time of working in a vacuum is now over and it is time to release all ideas to the assessment and critique of the world at large.

Please use the menu to the right to find the pages most appropriate to you level of interest.  If you are new or ‘new-ish’ to physics, please take a little time to read up on the background pages first as the concepts therein will be referred to often in the main arguments of QTD.

For the record, this has been a continually published development of ideas and concepts starting in early 1996. The term, "Quantum Temporal Dynamics" is the descriptor for a line of  reasoning; Quantum (smallest units) Temporal (time) Dynamics (Interaction).  I make no claim to have invented it (it was a descriptor coined way before this work – see Bohr, Einstein, Oppenheimer & Feynman). QTD is merely a description of the exploration of time as quanta and its interactions within the standard model of physics. Science in the 21st century is about collaboration and open discussion.

[I was recently contacted by an author of 2011 claiming priority and copyright of this descriptor despite the fact that I have published this nominator in 1996 and registered this site in 2009. Others have used these same descriptors well before that.  Thankfully, cached copies of published pages and forum peer discussions exist to prove the falsehood of such claims.]

Cheers,.. Craig

  • http://www.deletethissite.com Dulce Cosgrove

    Love your site man keep up the good work

  • http://www.answersfrom.com Elena Ornig

    I am so happy that you started this site. Personally, I prefer your entertaining lectures but on the other hand- I can take your brilliance in, at my own pace. I envy you – for your ability to fly much further than my own comprehension of space and particularly TIME. Please keep going, even if I have to crawl behind – I am determent to catch up with your hypothesis because I’m deeply fascinated by your thinking process. I greatly respect any one, who brave enough, to go against dogmas. Therefore, I wish you to concur darkness and give us the real light !!!
    Warmest regards,
    Elena ornig

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNis1qzE5q4 ANDREW J. HENDRICKS

    GRAND UNIFICATION THROUGH A QUANTUM THEORY OF GRAVITY

    BY ANDREW J. HENDRICKS
    EMAIL theooo1@aol.com

    “ABSTRACT”

    Please allow me to begin with a short digression about an author of one of my childhood
    science books, explaining how some early scientists didn’t believe in the presence of oxygen
    because they couldn’t see it, what would chemistry be today if oxygen had never been
    acknowledged? The most brilliant people in the world haven’t been able to unify the forces,
    certainly not for lack of intelligence, it was because they always began with insufficient information. A

    permanent structure can not be completed without a solid foundation,
    change is inevitable, but just how much change will surprise you.

    We know that groups of molecules and energy under the right conditions create what we
    know as a critical mass and explode outwards in all directions. These explosions can and
    have occurred on many different scales, the vast size of some may be hard to comprehend,
    creating many different sizes and shapes of existing molecules and their basic components,
    energy and mass all traveling outwards from the initiating force, creating pressure from the
    inside of the event pushing outward. Utilizing the law of inertia, the outside of the
    expanding particulate would want to stay at rest. The particulate closest to the center of the
    event pushing on all existing particulate creating different pressures, graduating stronger at
    points closer to the center, to weaker at the outer edge of the expanding events. These
    explosions create asymmetrical particulate much smaller than what we know as “atomic
    structures” also creating residual pressure, these smaller particles (field particles) make up
    most of the known universe in what is thought of as the void of outer space, all in
    pressurized contact with each of its surrounding particles.

    Field particles transmit all wave lengths of energy, consistent with a rack of billiard balls
    transmitting energy almost instantaneously, except in a omni-directional manner. Energy
    can not travel as waves though nothing.
    Energy cannot be destroyed or created, only its form altered, I found this statement to be
    very interesting, it involves energy changing form. Energy could not decide what to create
    next, therefore another source must dictate the outcome. That source is non spherical or an
    asymmetrical mass or particle, interrupting the directional flow of energy through field
    particles. As energy waves circumfluent larger, surrounded, non spherical particles, some of
    the energy must be placed into a feedback loop, continually orbiting indefinitely around an
    inner particle or particles as long as there is an energy feed or until the particle or particles
    change shape, canceling the energy system. If the same energy were to travel around a
    spherical shape, all energy would reach the back at the same time canceling the potential
    orbiting of energy. The direction energy travels and orbit frequency is dictated by the shape and size of

    the surrounding particles and the shape of the surrounded particle or particles.
    It is the direction that the orbiting energy travels that dictates the outcome of the energy
    creating a quantum form as mass. Different shaped particles coalesce in different densities
    forming different elements, the same shape particles coalescing in the same manner every
    time to create the same element. The manner in which particles coalesce is created by energy
    orbits traveling in opposite directions at the point of approach and the finite frequency of the
    orbiting energy, as the two particles or masses meet the energy at the point of approach
    will try to assume one another’s orbits, creating a weakness in the static barrier at the point
    of approach allowing field pressure from opposing sides to push the two structures together,
    the two separate orbits of energy becoming one, excess energy being cast away. In the
    opposite effect, if the two particles or masses had orbiting energy traveling in the same
    direction at the point of approach, the energy would be projected back towards approaching
    structures creating a repulsive effect. This explains the basic principles of molecular cohesion
    and magnetism.

    With molecular cohesion proceeding from micro to macro the same principle is still in effect,
    with the energy system being relative to the size of the mass and the redistributed pressure
    from the displacement of surrounding smaller field particles also energy release from the
    mass and surrounding energy sources. it is the redistributed pressure that facilitate orbit in
    masses. Gravity is similar to the sum of factors in an equation. Gravity is not an elemental
    force, it is an outcome of circumstances created by the pressurized particle field.

    In masses different shaped particles coalesce in different densities and decay at different
    rates, facilitating the regulation of energy release. If the outside of the mass is too dense for
    the trapped energy on the inside to be released and the pressure from the field particulate
    collapsed the outer surface, an explosive force would be necessary to stabilize the event and
    the process begins again.

  • Anonymous

    check out http://andersoninstitute.com/time-warped-fields.html
    have you read Eric Julien’s “The Science of Extraterrestrials”? You will enjoy as his main focus is on time and may provide some deeper insights for you.

  • butthead

    I suspect that invention of time travel machines will enable humans to travel to the past. Thus we will escape the rapid destruction of the future universe due to its increasingly accelerated expansion. If the latest experimental results are correct with regards to faster than light neutrinos causing negative space-time curvature, that means that as matter decays, more and more neutrinos are emitted, which will increase the value Einstein’s cosmological anti-gravity “constant” causing a runaway expansion effect…

    we can escape into the past and by doing so, will create ever more timeline branches of the Multiverse…

    I suspect that neutrinos are associated in some way with the cosmological term in Einstein’s field equations. This could lead to new technological breakthroughs like warp drive and time travel.

    • Morgan 12; future temp.phys.

      I like your use of fancy words to make it sound intelligent, but this technological advancement is much beyond the years of this era. Much the less, we are lacking the materials to create such an invention.

  • A. HENDRICKS

    Home

    New Text Widget 1

    http://www.youtube.c

    GRAND UNIFICATION THROUGH A QUANTUM THEORY OF GRAVITY

    Grand Unification

    New Text Widget 1

    GRAND UNIFICATION THROUGH A QUANTUM THEORY OF GRAVITY
    BY ANDREW J. HENDRICKS
    Please allow me to begin with a short digression about an author of one of my childhood
    science books, explaining how some early scientists didn’t believe in the presence of oxygen
    because they couldn’t see it, what would chemistry be today if oxygen had never been
    acknowledged? The most brilliant people in the world haven’t been able to unify the forces,
    certainly not for lack of intelligence, it was because they always began with insufficient
    information. A permanent structure can not be completed without a solid foundation,
    change is inevitable, but just how much change will surprise you.

    We know that groups of molecules and energy under the right conditions create what we
    know as a critical mass and explode outwards in all directions. These explosions can and
    have occurred on many different scales, the vast size of some may be hard to comprehend,
    creating many different sizes and shapes of existing molecules by
    breaking down these systems and their basic components,
    energy and mass all traveling outwards from the initiating force, creating pressure from the
    inside of the event pushing outward. Utilizing the law of inertia, the outside of the
    expanding particulate would want to stay at rest. The particulate closest to the center of the
    event pushing on all existing particulate creating different pressures, graduating stronger at
    points closer to the center, to weaker at the outer edge of the expanding events. These
    explosions create asymmetrical particulate much smaller than what we know as “atomic
    structures” also creating residual pressure, these smaller particles (field particles) make up
    most of the known universe in what is thought of as the void of outer space, all in
    pressurized contact with each of its surrounding particles.

    Field particles transmit all wave lengths of energy, consistent with a rack of billiard balls
    transmitting energy almost instantaneously, except in a omni-directional manner. Energy
    can not travel as waves though nothing.
    Energy cannot be destroyed or created, only its form altered, I found this statement to be
    very interesting, it involves energy changing form. Energy could not decide what to create
    next, therefore another source must dictate the outcome. That source is non spherical or an
    asymmetrical mass or particle, interrupting the directional flow of energy through field
    particles. As energy waves circumfluent larger, surrounded, non spherical particles, some of
    the energy must be placed into a feedback loop, continually orbiting indefinitely around an
    inner particle or particles as long as there is an energy feed or until the particle or particles
    change shape, canceling the energy system. If the same energy were to travel around a
    spherical shape, all energy would reach the back at the same time canceling the potential
    orbiting of energy. The direction energy travels and orbit frequency is dictated by the shape
    and size of the surrounding particles and the shape of the surrounded particle or particles.
    It is the direction that the orbiting energy travels that dictates the outcome of the energy
    creating a quantum form as mass. Different shaped particles coalesce in different densities
    forming different elements, the same shape particles coalescing in the same manner every
    time to create the same element. The manner in which particles coalesce is created by energy
    orbits traveling in opposite directions at the point of approach and the finite frequency of the
    orbiting energy, as the two particles or masses meet the energy at the point of approach
    will try to assume one another’s orbits, creating a weakness in the static barrier at the point
    of approach allowing field pressure from opposing sides to push the two structures together,
    the two separate orbits of energy becoming one, excess energy being cast away. In the
    opposite effect, if the two particles or masses had orbiting energy traveling in the same
    direction at the point of approach, the energy would be projected back towards approaching
    structures creating a repulsive effect. This explains the basic principles of molecular cohesion
    and magnetism.

    With molecular cohesion proceeding from micro to macro the same principle is still in effect,
    with the energy system being relative to the size of the mass and the redistributed pressure
    from the displacement of surrounding smaller field particles also energy release from the
    mass and surrounding energy sources. it is the redistributed pressure that facilitate orbit in
    masses. Gravity is similar to the sum of factors in an equation. Gravity is not an elemental
    force, it is an outcome of circumstances created by the pressurized particle field.

    In masses different shaped particles coalesce in different densities and decay at different
    rates, facilitating the regulation of energy release. If the outside of the mass is too dense for
    the trapped energy on the inside to be released and the pressure from the field particulate
    collapsed the outer surface, an explosive force would be necessary to stabilize the event and
    the process begins again.

    GRAND UNIFICATION THROUGH A QUANTUM THEORY OF GRAVITY
    BY ANDREW J. HENDRICKS
    Please allow me to begin with a short digression about an author of one of my childhood
    science books, explaining how some early scientists didn’t believe in the presence of oxygen
    because they couldn’t see it, what would chemistry be today if oxygen had never been
    acknowledged? The most brilliant people in the world haven’t been able to unify the forces,
    certainly not for lack of intelligence, it was because they always began with insufficient
    information. A permanent structure can not be completed without a solid foundation,
    change is inevitable, but just how much change will surprise you.

    We know that groups of molecules and energy under the right conditions create what we
    know as a critical mass and explode outwards in all directions. These explosions can and
    have occurred on many different scales, the vast size of some may be hard to comprehend,
    creating many different sizes and shapes of existing molecules by
    breaking down these systems and their basic components,
    energy and mass all traveling outwards from the initiating force, creating pressure from the
    inside of the event pushing outward. Utilizing the law of inertia, the outside of the
    expanding particulate would want to stay at rest. The particulate closest to the center of the
    event pushing on all existing particulate creating different pressures, graduating stronger at
    points closer to the center, to weaker at the outer edge of the expanding events. These
    explosions create asymmetrical particulate much smaller than what we know as “atomic
    structures” also creating residual pressure, these smaller particles (field particles) make up
    most of the known universe in what is thought of as the void of outer space, all in
    pressurized contact with each of its surrounding particles.

    Field particles transmit all wave lengths of energy, consistent with a rack of billiard balls
    transmitting energy almost instantaneously, except in a omni-directional manner. Energy
    can not travel as waves though nothing.
    Energy cannot be destroyed or created, only its form altered, I found this statement to be
    very interesting, it involves energy changing form. Energy could not decide what to create
    next, therefore another source must dictate the outcome. That source is non spherical or an
    asymmetrical mass or particle, interrupting the directional flow of energy through field
    particles. As energy waves circumfluent larger, surrounded, non spherical particles, some of
    the energy must be placed into a feedback loop, continually orbiting indefinitely around an
    inner particle or particles as long as there is an energy feed or until the particle or particles
    change shape, canceling the energy system. If the same energy were to travel around a
    spherical shape, all energy would reach the back at the same time canceling the potential
    orbiting of energy. The direction energy travels and orbit frequency is dictated by the shape
    and size of the surrounding particles and the shape of the surrounded particle or particles.
    It is the direction that the orbiting energy travels that dictates the outcome of the energy
    creating a quantum form as mass. Different shaped particles coalesce in different densities
    forming different elements, the same shape particles coalescing in the same manner every
    time to create the same element. The manner in which particles coalesce is created by energy
    orbits traveling in opposite directions at the point of approach and the finite frequency of the
    orbiting energy, as the two particles or masses meet the energy at the point of approach
    will try to assume one another’s orbits, creating a weakness in the static barrier at the point
    of approach allowing field pressure from opposing sides to push the two structures together,
    the two separate orbits of energy becoming one, excess energy being cast away. In the
    opposite effect, if the two particles or masses had orbiting energy traveling in the same
    direction at the point of approach, the energy would be projected back towards approaching
    structures creating a repulsive effect. This explains the basic principles of molecular cohesion
    and magnetism.

    With molecular cohesion proceeding from micro to macro the same principle is still in effect,
    with the energy system being relative to the size of the mass and the redistributed pressure
    from the displacement of surrounding smaller field particles also energy release from the
    mass and surrounding energy sources. it is the redistributed pressure that facilitate orbit in
    masses. Gravity is similar to the sum of factors in an equation. Gravity is not an elemental
    force, it is an outcome of circumstances created by the pressurized particle field.

    In masses different shaped particles coalesce in different densities and decay at different
    rates, facilitating the regulation of energy release. If the outside of the mass is too dense for
    the trapped energy on the inside to be released and the pressure from the field particulate
    collapsed the outer surface, an explosive force would be necessary to stabilize the event and
    the process begins again.

  • Morgan 12; future temp.phys.

    Time is not, in fact, linear, but more as the most confusing force there is in the Universe. Time is just an infinity, in all directions and all possible yet impossible directions. Each moment, narrowed down by an infinity multiplied by an infinity, is an infinity of aborted timelines. It progresses through these aborted timelines all at the same time which at this is no time at all. An infinity. Therefore, we are always time. Time is us because it has to be. We are everywhere in time and space, but the aborted timelines divide us. Imagine what you could see if you just looked past your mind and accepted that these possibilities had to be because they can’t. We only see in our heads, when we, as time, are capable of so much more.

    • Shelia Rae

      @ Morgan you are right

  • Chris Mannering

    is there any connection between Quantum Temporal Dynamics, and the work of William Tifft, and his culminating theory Quantum Temporal Cosmology? thanks!

  • Paul Westell

    I propose that: stripped to their simplest concepts,
    “force” is an expression of energy, and
    “dimension” the constraint of energy.

    To prove time as a force, it may be necessary only to show that time (perhaps like gravity) is not merely a local constant.

  • Chris Mannering

    Is there a major prediction that can be checked empirically, just no one thought to look in that place, or whatever?
    What is the prediction?

© 2012 Quantum Temporal Dynamics | Linear Time as a Force | Gravity as a Temporal Effect Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha