Home
Welcome to Quantum Temporal Dynamics. I place here for all an open invitation to respectful discussion of the hypothesis herein; especially in seeking disproof of the principles herein.
For the record, I seek collaboration with a mathematician or team with sufficient skill to take these principles through from concept to hypothesis and develop proofs. This hypothesis is nothing less than a Grand Unification Theory which has stood up to conceptual arguments thus far.
My motivation is both for the ideology of discovery and the personal satisfaction of contributing in some material way to our understanding of the universe and, ultimately, our place within it. I believe that truly free energy in the form of ‘free’ DC current will result directly from this hypothesis, as may greater than C (local) movement via temporal field manipulation. (For the Trekkies out there, yes, we are talking about literally warping the temporal field, so you can call it ‘Warp’ if you want!)
Some of the material herein exposes concepts ranging from flashes of the blindingly obvious right through to the strangest edges of quantum weirdness. ‘Pure physicists’ will find some of the conclusions uncomfortable, especially in relation to the accepted explanation of the standard model, but with QED’s ‘proton problem’ of recent weeks…
Please bear with me as I upgrade this site, I will be working on it as much as is possible whilst retaining quality. Please drop me a line if you’ve got something to say.
Cheers,.. Craig
********************************
Primary postulations of Quantum Temporal Dynamics
- Non-linear time is the natural temporal form and linearity in any form is an aberrant phenomena requiring reason.
- The polar opposite, non-linear qualities (continuum?) of Potential (temporal energy; negative charge) and Probability (mass; positive charge) require a mechanism of regulated exchange of energy as non-linear qualities can not acknowledge the existence of something else directly without losing their infinite quality.
- Our physical universe is that mechanism of exchange, with the physical laws of linearity sufficiently different to non-linear laws to allow recognition by both continuum, and by implication, each-other; as well as acting as the regulated medium of exchange between Potential and Probability, preventing ‘short circuiting’.
- Autonomic Observation occurs as chemistry and material properties and is distinct to Relativistic Observation which is exclusive to life and major masses (planets etc. via gravity) and is the observation of relative values beyond chemistry.
I.e. – water molecules observe other water molecules as chemical bonds and chemical interactions within that mass of water (autonomic) where a shark sees a fish and pursues it relative to itself and the reef (relativistic).
Linear time is the foundation of our physical universe, expressed as temporal energy by theoretically implied trans-temporal pseudo-particles nominated as Tachyons. Conservation and probabilistic determination of potential require the most efficient number of dimensions to allow entropy to define linear space, with X, Y & Z axes the most efficient descriptions to fulfil the dimensional requirements of linear space. (This is based upon probability’s requirement to consider every possible convolution of outcome to be able to determine the most probable.)
Ed. – Implied by this presumption is that our universe is pre-disposed, or at least idealised by its physical laws towards the occurrence of life as what else by life can create observations and chaos (increased potential outcome convolutions for probability to get its teeth into).
Tachyon field density (number of tachyons occurring within a given cubic space) increases in direct response to lower temporal pressures which is consistent with the demand for temporal energy of mass.
QTD’s Universal Constant is the rate of inter-tachyon communication, the rate of transfer of electromagnetic spectra (including temporal energy [time]) defines the local value of ‘c’. Tachyon field density is the mechanism that defines the value of light-speed in any density of material, and tachyon field density is consistently predicted by the refraction index of a physical material.
Variations in light speed within a given tachyon field account for relative differences in energetic potentials of mass consistent with Einstein’s [problematic] relativity equation.
Ed – The slower light speed is, the less energy and mass there is – it has to work both ways!
Within massive objects, the speed of light is so slowed that the relative mass is essentially ‘absorbed’ in response to the higher tachyon density and its predictable reduction in the value of local light speed resulting in energy and mass reduction (relative to our perspective). The upshot is that most cosmic scale things may be quite a bit more massive than we predict, but when observed from our ‘time zone’, the effects are leaking out of slower time at a constant rate (relative to us), offering tantalising glimpses in refining calculations of celestial masses and more accurately model gravitational effects.
Tachyons occur consistent with the ‘mass majority’ of a physical body (this is why galaxies typically rotate consistently across their radii as opposed to a typical orbital model). Whilst tachyons are trans-temporal, they have a certain level of probability and exhibit a mass-like ‘consensus’ effect, also exerting directional temporal pressure on physical structures to conform to the field’s direction and velocity. Being Mass-less themselves, tachyons do not conform to physical orbital mechanics and conform instead to the greatest consensus of mass momentum and velocity.
Gravity is the effect of Temporal Offset within a temporal field not in its ground state, with a fully averaged temporal offset value exerting pressure upon a mass, countered by linear physical laws (momentum etc.). For example, a person standing on the surface of a planet has an averaged 3 dimensional temporal offset roughly consistent with the planet’s mass centre. At altitude, the temporal offset is proportionately reduced in relation to the planet’s centre, resulting in a lesser gravitational effect. Gravity is the farthest reaching of all temporal effects, but is of the same mechanism as the stronger weak and strong forces, resulting in it being the weakest of temporal force effects.
Ed. – Time variations variant due to the proximity of mass is also neatly explicable in the tachyon field density postulate.
Weak Nuclear Force results from Tachyons within a mass supplying their surrounding mass (on a demand ratio) without contributing much temporal energy to more distant mass (like a planet where temporal energy is far more scattered within a generally lower tachyon field density) Thus, the temporal offset effect within the immediately supplied mass is far more localised, affecting the physical laws of the given matter, binding atomic structures within a material more strongly than outside of itself.
Ed. - Think of cold-welding in space as a great example of this postulate in action. No atmospheric particle mass to ‘distract’ closely approximate, sympathetic materials resulting in weak force taking over at a point of contact unless the materials are sufficiently different in mass properties to ‘distract’ the weak force. Another great example in aggregated weak attraction is Van der Waals force (think of a Gecko’s foot pads).
Strong Nuclear Force results as an extension of the above concepts of Weak, where tachyons contained within an atomic structure’s mass are supplying almost exclusively the point particles within that structure, exerting a far stronger but far more localised temporal attraction force upon those point particles, welding them together consistent with QCD and QED.
Ed – in the recent exposure of a protons PHYSICAL size being smaller that predicted by QED, the tachyon density postulate requires two solutions, one dynamic and interactive value and one static from external observation, with the interactive value reflecting the greater mass contained reflecting the slower value of local ‘c’ and the physical measurement showing just the temporal observation dependant totally on the observer’s reference time. Both QED and the physical measurements of a proton are correct to the value of the observation.
Electromagnetism is a result of resonance induced deflection / directionality of the temporal field localised to that resonant material. Picture a ‘shaped’ temporal offset field rather than spheroid.
Physical Properties of Matter are consistent and predictable with the tachyon field density and resonance of a given material. This includes the interactions of temporal differences between two or more compared materials.
Physical shock waves must, by temporal field density pressure, be waves of temporal distortion as well as physical pressure wave forms. This alters the temporal qualities of materials that the shock wave passes through, forcing a greater physical effect.
Surface tension is explained by QTD’s model of weak force where the temporal difference between water and air [and the Weak force of each material density] demands a greater boundary effect at the atomic structurally defined surface of a material than it does within that material.
Temporal energy [introduced by Tachyons within our universe] is consistent within any relative tachyon field density as the local value of C remains constant to local observation. Whether out physical universe is contained within a super-massive black hole makes no difference – our tachyon field density defines the energy and subsequent values of matter, mass and space. Our universe is billions of light years across as determined by OUR observation of space. If the Big Bang model is correct, then a wave or light would have taken the same time to cross the universe, no matter how compressed or dilated the tachyon field is in relation to our current observations (as we see it now or relative to the size of a tennis ball by today’s observational standards).
The conundrum of reconciling Relativity and Quantum Theory at the elemental level ignores the relative and scaled value of time’s passage within an observation. If ‘c’ is highly variable measured against a static point of observation, the relative values of energy and mass are also highly variable in a relativistic sense. Neither Relativity nor Quantum Theory are contravened when the temporal offset model is considered.
Dark Energy – We actually see Dark Energy’s effect at every vibratory stroke of our atomic clocks – it is temporal energy. Dark Energy is essentially homogeneous throughout our universe because our local value of c is the measure against which we observe differing tachyon field densities (remember that ‘c’ is governed by tachyon-tachyon rate, not an external value of measure, as is physical dimensionality).
Dark Matter – The highly variable nature of tachyon density and local values of ‘c’ within a mass account for a high discrepancy in observed density and mass and actual, final values. The probability of tachyons also has a Mass-Like, fluidic effect conforming to the majority of mass within massive structures like galaxies.
Ed. – Physical Time Travel is not likely to be mechanically possible for particles which are dependant upon mass bearing qualities, but non-mass bearing particles (e.g. Photons) may transit the quantum vacuum easily via tachyons. As tachyons are trans-temporal mechanisms, non-mass phenomena may also act in a trans-temporal fashion. Maybe though, trans-temporal observation may be possible (???).
Observation is the point of ‘now’, propelled forward by non-symmetrical, temporal energy – the exchange between negative and positive charge – representing the point of probabilistic resolution. This leads to a model of a singular past with a ‘membrane’ of ‘now’ being our moment of observation. The most enduringly energetic future path potential is the one selected by the process of temporal distillation, cancelling out all other competing futures into the most probable path possible.
Temporal Energy expressed as Linear Time is the most singularly powerful and energetic force within our linear universe and binds all other field force effects within the one mechanism. It is the mechanism of charge, change and all physical laws.
*********************************
Thanks for getting this far folks. I am very serious about garnering collaboration for the ultimate publishing of this conceptual paper as a valid scientific hypothesis. Please contact me ASAP if you feel you may be able to either poke a hole in the concepts or if you’d like to explore the possibilities of collaboration.
Cheers,.. Craig
-
http://www.deletethissite.com Dulce Cosgrove
-
http://www.answersfrom.com Elena Ornig
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNis1qzE5q4 ANDREW J. HENDRICKS
-
Anonymous
-
butthead